The application process for September 2016 entry has now closed. Please look back late in 2016 for details of 2017 entry.

If you have any queries, please see the FAQs in the first instance.  If these do not answer your question, please email

The Admissions Process

The Heritage Consortium uses a simple single applications process using the same form and selection process for both the funded studentships and places on the doctoral programme. The subsequent allocation of successful candidates to individual institutions is decided on the basis of appropriate match of the student’s research proposal to the institution and lead supervisor.


Applicants seeking an AHRC studentship should check pp. 11-12 in the Student Funding Guide to see if they meet the requirements relating to UK or EU residence. Further general information may be found here.

Stage 1 – Application

Applicants apply by the advertised deadline by completing the form below and sending it together with scanned copies of their relevant qualifications to Applicants must also contact two referees who should send their references direct to by the application deadline.

Stage 2 – Selection

Applications are graded by the Consortium’s Admissions Board according to its criteria and shortlisted candidates are invited for interview by a panel of three staff.

Stage 3 – Outcome

Applicants will be notified by Hull Graduate School, on behalf of the Consortium, with one of three possible decisions:

  1. An applicant is offered a place on the doctoral programme and an AHRC studentship
  2. An applicant is offered a place on the doctoral programme
  3. Application rejected

Owing to the volume of applications received, it is not possible to provide feedback on applications that are not shortlisted: candidates who are unsuccessful at interview will be provided with written feedback.


Assessment Criteria

1. Academic Quality

The Admissions Board is looking for evidence of applicants’ potential to complete a doctoral programme successfully. They will consider applicants’ past academic achievements in terms of quality and appropriateness as preparation for the proposed field of research, as well as applicants’ research and presentation skills as evidenced by the application and interview. They will also consider referees’ evaluations of applicants’ abilities and their prediction of likely grades where these are still pending.

2. Research Proposal

Applicants will be assessed according to their ability to articulate a clear and concise research proposal. The Admissions Board is looking for awareness of the topic’s significance and potential including for those outside academia, evidence of a coherent plan for completing the project within the timeframe of the programme (full or part-time), and an awareness of how the topic relates to wider research in the field. In particular, the Board will look for evidence that the proposed research has the potential to constitute an original contribution to knowledge.  Please stick closely to the word limits set out on the application form: the Board will not consider additional statement supplied with the application form, and will disqualify proposals that are significantly over-length.

3. Professional Development

The Admissions Board is looking for evidence that applicants are equipped to develop as researchers and that they are able to relate their research to professional and career goals. Assessment will consider how applicants’ educational and (where appropriate) professional development has prepared them for doctoral study, as well as their ability to relate their qualifications, expertise and proposed research to their career plans. Where appropriate, referees comments on past professional development will be considered.

4. Fit with Support and Resource

The Admissions Board will need to judge how far the proposed research fits within the Consortium’s strategic remit, as well as determining that the student can be supported and supervised by the Consortium members.

Applicants are strongly encouraged to make full use of the information provided by the Consortium and its members on their websites and other material, and to contact relevant staff for advice before completing their application.


Applications should be supported by two references.  Referees are asked to comment on applicants’ potential to complete the proposed programme successfully, on research and writing skills, on ability to work independently, and on any relevant professional experience the applicant may have.  Please note, referees should email their references to by 15 February – i.e. the same deadline as for the application itself.


Copies of degree certificates and other relevant qualifications can be submitted as pdf files or in any image format (e.g. jpeg, gif, tiff).  Please resize files so that they are no larger than 1mb.



☐    Read the Student Funding Guide (If applying for an AHRC studentship)

☐    Complete all sections of the 139 kBCDT application form

☐    Save the form in the format: surname-initial.application.doc (or pdf, or docx)

☐    Scan certificates, resize if necessary, and save as: surname-initial.cert.pdf (or jpeg)

☐    Email form and certificates to by 15 February 2016, at 5pm.

☐    Contact two referees to send references direct to by 15 February 2016, at 5pm.

Our partners


Connect with us